Turning Material Weakness Into Momentum

Material weaknesses come with high cost to an organization.

Material Weakness Remediation

Material weaknesses are more than a compliance issue. In fact, they are a signal that risk is not being effectively managed across the company. From a governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) standpoint, material weaknesses offer an opportunity to realign controls and refine risk management frameworks.

Material weaknesses come with high cost to an organization. Organizations who experience material weaknesses in their internal controls often face increased regulatory scrutiny, loss of stakeholder confidence, and struggles with operational inefficiencies; however, by using a strategic approach that is focused on governance, process integration, and technology, the remediation of a material weakness can result in stronger business performance and risk-informed decision-making.

A successful material weakness remediation project goes beyond audit readiness. It embeds risk awareness into daily operations and business culture, while also creating a foundation for long-term success.

Successful remediation of a material weakness for organizations can transform setbacks into long-term strategic gains.

What is a material weakness?

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a prompt basis.

Material weaknesses often stem from:

Broken governance structures
Inadequate risk oversight or control ownership
Gaps in documentation, policy, or knowledge
Manual processes prone to human error

Material weaknesses carry real and reputational consequences:

Regulatory exposure: The SEC and PCAOB may need public disclosure, trigger restatements, or impose enforcement actions.
Business disruption: Unremediated material weaknesses can delay strategic initiatives and erode operational agility.
Cost implications: Increased audit fees, remediation costs, and internal resource strain are often a result of material weaknesses.

From a GRC standpoint, these issues show systemic risks that affect decision-making, strategy, and performance.

Where Leading GRC Teams Are Already Looking Ahead

Identifying the Root Cause

Material weaknesses reveal more than control failures. Material weaknesses in ICFR highlight governance and risk integration issues. A GRC-enabled approach to remediating material weaknesses involves root cause analysis that goes beyond control testing. It evaluates the governance environment, risk appetite, and process design that allowed the material weakness to appear.

Key techniques include:

Inquiry: Understand the key issues and expected results through interviews with external auditors and key stakeholders in the processes.
Process walkthroughs: Map risks and controls end-to-end to find where breakdowns occur and what could go wrong.
Control effectiveness reviews: Decide whether controls are properly designed and consistently operating effectively.
Risk assessments: Align control gaps with enterprise risk priorities to perform remediation effectively.

GRC leaders must distinguish:

Knowledge gaps (lack of awareness or training)
Process gaps (control design failures or lack of oversight)

When planning the remediation of material weaknesses, it is important that organizations focus on finding the underlying reasons for the issue versus the surface-level fixes. For example, if a company finds a material weakness in applying revenue recognition standards resulting in improper revenue recognition (the” symptom”). The root cause of a material weakness may be attributed to knowledge gaps within the company due to turnover in significant accounting roles and staffing shortages. To address the symptom of improper revenue recognition, the company should review hiring decisions to increase headcount for key roles. Clearly finding the root cause enables meaningful, scalable solutions to remediate the issue.

Building and Executing a Remediation Roadmap

Material weakness remediation should be treated as a cross-functional transformation project with a clearly defined project plan that includes:

Strategy setting: Set up clear goals that align audit remediation that addresses the root cause and enterprise risk goals.
Stakeholder engagement: Involve finance, operations, compliance, risk, IT, and internal audit to drive collaboration.
Ownership assignment: Establish ownership of controls. Management must accept ownership and accountability for control activities.
Governance development: Institute a central steering function to track progress, manage accountability, and escalate issues.

Making remediation a part of the broader GRC framework ensures improvements evolve with the business. It is essential to include stakeholders from all pertinent departments throughout the company to ensure successful remediation of material weaknesses. Doing so prevents the remediation process from occurring in a silo, which can lead to disjointed efforts, more control failures, and a disconnect from the company’s established strategic goals.

Leveraging Technology and Automation

Including digital solutions in the remediation project plan is ideal for efficient, sustainable remediation and optimal ongoing control effectiveness. Leveraging technology reduces the risk of human error in manual processes and increases efficiency. Technology opportunities in remediation include:

GRC platforms (i.e., Workiva, AuditBoard) provide integrated documentation, testing, reporting, and control/approval workflows.
Automation of control testing reduces errors from manual testing and supports continuous monitoring, which creates more proactive identification of issues and risks to prevent future material weaknesses.
Data analytics offer insights into trends, control effectiveness, and emerging risks over large populations that can enhance auditing capability and decision-making.
AI tools can analyze large volumes of data and detect patterns, anomalies, risks, and gaps that will improve the speed, efficacy, and accuracy of remediation project plans and ongoing monitoring by making them more strategic and data driven.

The use of technology will not just improve the remediation roadmap for material weaknesses. It will mature the governance of the organization to become more preventative and efficient. For example, a company having difficulty evidencing their approval process for a control could implement a GRC platform with integrated workflows to collect approvals and identify missing approvals before they rise to the level of material weakness. By embedding technology into the control environment, companies shift to an approach that strengthens compliance and creates proactive risk management.

Ongoing Monitoring

Once remediation is complete, ongoing monitoring of the measures implemented is critical to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of the control environment. Without ongoing monitoring, even well-designed controls can deteriorate as business processes evolve or new risks appear. Leveraging technology can provide early indicators of potential control failures and reduce the probability of future material weaknesses. Monitoring is integral to promote accountability, transparency, and alignment with organizational goals.

Next Steps

When presented with a material weakness, the next steps can be overwhelming to management. GRC and internal audit functions can address and remediate material weaknesses by using a trusted partner with specialized expertise and experience, such as Acclarity. Acclarity’s team of GRC professionals are equipped with the skills in risk and governance to identify and address root causes, establish and execute a remediation project plan, and leverage technology to gain efficiency and reduce risk. Successful remediation of a material weakness for organizations can transform setbacks into long-term strategic gains.

Talk To Jill Kerns About This Topic

A solutions-oriented, CISA-certified professional, Jill brings over 20 years of experience in internal controls, IT security, and regulatory compliance. She has led and executed projects across industries, including SOX and JSOX testing, SOC examinations, and audits related to data privacy. With a strong background in IT risk and internal audit, she specializes in helping organizations strengthen security and compliance frameworks. Jill began her career at Deloitte in Enterprise Risk Services, where she conducted IT audits and implemented SOX programs.

Latest insights

Leadership, News 12.18.25

Beyond the Checklist: The Hidden End-of-Year GRC Priorities That Will Define 2026

Beyond the Checklist: The Hidden End-of-Year GRC Priorities That Will Define 2026. As the year winds down, most Governance, Risk, Compliance, and Internal Audit organizations focus on familiar priorities. But the most significant risks rarely appear in year-end closeouts.

Learn More

Leadership, News 12.10.25

How to Know When Your Company Needs a Fractional Controller or Fractional CFO

Learn More

Leadership, News 11.18.25

Human Intelligence in a Governance World: Why People Still Matter Most

The Human Factor: The Real Engine of Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC)

Learn More

LET'S GET CLEAR.

Enough about us — we want to hear from you. Let’s connect.